Breaking down Ethereum rollups – What makes a rollup optimistic vs zero knowledge?

Ethereum, the world’s second-largest blockchain network, persistently grappling with scalability issues due to its popularity and increased network congestion, has had the concept of Layer 2 chains in mind since 2014. As more users and decentralized applications (dApps) were released, transaction costs skyrocketed, and processing times slowed significantly. To address these challenges, developers explored various scaling solutions to optimize Layer 2s, with Ethereum rollups emerging as one of the most promising approaches.

What are Ethereum Rollups?

An Ethereum rollup is a Layer 2 scaling solution that processes multiple transactions off the main Ethereum blockchain (Layer 1), bundles them into a single transaction, and then submits this bundled transaction back to the main chain. By moving the bulk of transaction processing off-chain, rollups can significantly increase the throughput of the Ethereum network while reducing gas fees for users.

Rollups are designed to maintain the security and decentralization of the Ethereum mainnet while improving its scalability. They achieve this by leveraging the main chain for data storage and dispute resolution while executing transactions on a separate layer. This approach allows rollups to benefit from Ethereum’s security while minimizing the load on the main network.

There are two main types of Ethereum rollups: Optimistic Rollups and Zero-Knowledge Rollups (ZK-Rollups).

Optimistic Rollups

Optimistic rollups operate on the assumption that all transactions are valid until proven otherwise. They process transactions off-chain and submit the transaction data to the main Ethereum chain along with cryptographic proof. Anyone who suspects a fraudulent transaction can challenge it during a dispute period. If a transaction is proven invalid, the rollup executes a “fraud-proof” and reverts the invalid transaction.

Advantages of Optimistic Rollups:

• Lower computational costs compared to ZK-Rollups
• More straightforward to implement and integrate with existing Ethereum infrastructure
• Compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM), allowing for easier migration of dApps

Disadvantages of Optimistic Rollups:

• Longer withdrawal times due to the dispute period (up to 1-2 weeks)
• Potential vulnerability to fraudulent challenges
• Reliance on the availability of honest validators to challenge invalid transactions

Examples of Optimistic Rollup projects include Optimism and Arbitrum.

Zero-Knowledge Rollups (ZK-Rollups)

ZK-Rollups use zero-knowledge proofs, a cryptographic technique that allows one party to prove the validity of a statement to another party without revealing any additional information. In the context of Ethereum rollups, ZK-Rollups process transactions off-chain and generate a cryptographic proof, known as a SNARK (Succinct Non-Interactive Argument of Knowledge), which is then submitted to the main Ethereum chain.

Advantages of ZK-Rollups:

• Faster transaction finality, as validity proofs are immediately verifiable
• Higher throughput compared to Optimistic Rollups
• Better privacy, as transaction details, are not revealed on the main chain
• No need for a dispute period, reducing withdrawal times

Disadvantages of ZK-Rollups:

• Higher computational costs for generating validity proofs
• More complex to implement and integrate with existing infrastructure
• Higher workload for compatibility with the EVM, often requiring smart contracts to be rewritten for ZK-Rollup compatibility

Examples of ZK-Rollup projects include Loopring, Starkware, and zkSync.

Ethereum rollups represent a promising approach to scaling the Ethereum network while maintaining its security and decentralization. As the ecosystem matures and more projects implement rollup solutions, users can look forward to lower transaction costs, faster processing times, and a more accessible and user-friendly experience on the Ethereum network.

Mentioned in this article